What Are You Showing Him?

Nearly four in five boys say they don't know what masculinity is.

Not that they reject it. Not that they've been told it's dangerous and switched off. The question is simply open — unanswered by anyone in their lives with standing to answer it. That is a different problem from the one most commentators are describing, and it needs a different response.

What the research actually shows

A study of more than 1,000 adolescents, reported in Nature earlier this month, puts numbers to what many men working with boys already sense. More than 80% say there aren't enough real-world spaces to be a boy. More than half find the online world more rewarding than the physical one. Nearly 80% say they aren't clear what masculinity is.

That last figure does not include boys who have absorbed the "toxic masculinity" framing and are reacting against it. Those boys have been given a definition and found it hostile, a different problem with a different cause. The 80% are boys for whom the question remains genuinely open. Nobody in their physical lives has answered it. The online world fills that vacancy not by creating the hunger but by monetising it.

Public debate proceeds as if the primary danger is boys consuming misogynist content. That concern is real but downstream of something the data keeps pointing at: a prior vacancy of meaning and male presence, with nobody in the physical world making a competing offer. The vacancy came first. Into that vacancy rushes content — which explains but cannot demonstrate.

Definitions without demonstrations

Boys remember slogans. What they cannot do is learn from them. A slogan tells a boy what a man should be. Only a man in the room can show him what one actually is.

A boy who grows up watching a man navigate difficulty without collapsing, honour obligations he didn't choose, hold a standard under pressure — that boy absorbs a working definition of masculinity before anyone has used the word in his presence. He may not be able to articulate it for years. But it is in him, available when his own moment arrives. Boys absorb scripts from schools and campaigns and social media, but those scripts remain abstract until anchored in a living example. Without that anchor, the script produces more discussion than formation.

A boy who watches a man fail, refuse to lie about it, and keep going anyway has just received a working definition of masculinity more durable than any classroom poster.

That is what the 80% figure is measuring. A shortage of men present, doing real things, with boys alongside them — not a shortage of content about what men should be.

The distinction between telling and showing is structural, not motivational. Definitions are transferable; demonstrations require presence. You cannot outsource demonstration, and no amount of the first substitutes for it. A boy who has watched a man he respects absorb an unfair outcome or hold his nerve when it cost him something has received something no programme can replicate and no algorithm can manufacture.

What presence really means

The study notes that more than 80% of boys say there aren't enough real-world spaces. Worth being precise about what a real-world space is, because the answer is less institutional than it sounds.

A real-world space is anywhere a boy encounters a man doing something that matters and is close enough to watch how it is done. A training session where the standard is genuine, a kitchen where a man cooks seriously and hands a boy a task, a workshop or site where decisions are being made about something real. The venue is not the point. The proximity is.

What makes these spaces formational is not their existence but the quality of attention inside them. A man who is physically present but elsewhere (on his phone, going through the motions) still demonstrates something, but not the thing intended. Formation requires a man who is actually there, willing to be observed doing real work honestly.

That kind of presence asks nothing heroic. It requires a man who has not retreated into his own concerns, who notices the younger man beside him and adjusts his pace accordingly.

The close

Nearly four in five boys say they don't know what masculinity is. The answer is not a better curriculum or a sharper awareness campaign. Those produce boys who can discuss masculinity rather than boys who have watched it.

Name one boy — your son, a nephew, someone on your team. Does he see you up close when things are not going well? Does he see you fail, recover, and keep your word?

You don't fix the 80% with a better definition. You fix it by letting one boy watch you keep it.

Forge Hub is written by Richard Morrissey, a father of nine and primary homemaker of 27 years. I also write about family formation at Happy Family Better World, and on politics and theology at Medium. My advisory practice for parents is at richardmorrissey.org.

Reply

or to participate.